Case Summary
Fathima, a 55-year-old plaintiff, filed a suit against the children of Thalappil Moideenkutty seeking declaration and partition of properties.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Civil Suit - Declaration and Partition
Final Judgment
No
The suit for declaration and partition was dismissed with costs.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for declaration and partition.
The counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called absent. Hence suit is dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Fathima
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- W/o Mohammed Hussain
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thalappil Moideenkutty's children
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nafeesa
- Party Age
- 45
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nazer
- Party Age
- 42
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kizhakkam Kunnath Abdussalam
- Party Age
- 48
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Koladi Mumthas
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o Kizhakkam Kunnath Abdussalam
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Seeking declaration and partition of properties
Evidence:
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Declaration and Partition
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Fathima vs Thalappil Moideenkutty's children et al regarding declaration and partition
Case Code Year
Case between Fathima vs Thalappil Moideenkutty's children et al regarding declaration and partition