Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.21 OF 2016

Case between Fathima et al vs Abdul Hakeem regarding eviction and license fee arrears

Court
Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-06-30
Duration
11 months
Case Closed
Fri, 06/30/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioners seek eviction of respondent due to license fee arrears and plan to start a Mini Super Market on the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petitioners are granted an order for eviction and possession of the property within one month, pending deposit of arrears by the respondent.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction and vacant possession
Case Type
Eviction - Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petitioners are granted an order for eviction and possession of the property within one month, pending deposit of arrears by the respondent.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners are entitled to eviction due to arrears of rent and bonafide need to start a Mini Super Market as the respondent failed to pay license fee.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioners are entitled to eviction due to arrears of rent and bonafide need to start a Mini Super Market as the respondent failed to pay license fee.
Supporting Evidence
Since the respondent remained exparte, the evidence adduced by the petitioner remained unchallenged. I find no reason to disbelieve the petitioner. Therefore, I hold a view that the petitioners are entitled for an order under section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala Building Lease and Rent Control Act.

Judgment Evidence:

The petitioners are entitled for an order u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act. In the result, the petition is allowed under section 11(2) (b) and 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965. a) The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule property within one month from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Fathima
Party Age
51
Relation
W/o. Moideen
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammed Afeekh
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o. Moideen
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ashikh
Party Age
21
Relation
S/o. Moideen
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Hamna
Party Age
16
Relation
D/o. Moideen
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Hakeem.P
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o. Kunhimuhammed
Plaintiffs Documents
Registered Lawyer notice dated 12-10-2015, Acknowledgment Card, Reply notice dated 17-10-2015
Defendants Documents
Not available

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Eviction and vacant possession
Evidence:
The petitioners are entitled for an order u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act. In the result, the petition is allowed under section 11(2) (b) and 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965. The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule property within one month from today.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Registered Lawyer notice with postal receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sent to revoke license due to arrears of rent
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Received in response to the revocation of license
Reference:
A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Eviction - Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Arrears of Rent
Case Code
Case between Fathima et al vs Abdul Hakeem regarding eviction and license fee arrears
Case Code Year
Case between Fathima et al vs Abdul Hakeem regarding eviction and license fee arrears

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Fri, 07/08/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 06/30/2017 - 12:00
From
Thu, 06/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Fri, 06/30/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Puliyakkathodi Koitha et al vs Puliyakkathodi Kolavan et al regarding property delivery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Property Delivery Plaintiff Won
Case between Pelayam Parmabil Hamza and Kunhikrishnan et al regarding eviction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Eviction Defendant Won
Case between Moideenkutty vs Mannarathodi Nizar regarding arrears of rent and increase of rent
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Arrears of Rent Plaintiff Won
Case between Musthafa and Moideenkutty regarding arrears of rent
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Arrears of Rent Defendant Won
Case between Aminakutty et al vs Rajan regarding eviction and ownership dispute
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Eviction - Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won