Case Summary
The petitioners, Faizal E and Hajara, are landlords seeking eviction of the respondent, P P Nizar, for non-payment of rent. The respondent failed to comply with previous court orders to pay arrears and show cause for the delay.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the respondent from the petition schedule shop room
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the eviction of the respondent due to non-payment of rent despite multiple opportunities provided. The respondent failed to show cause against eviction.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order to pay rent and did not show sufficient cause for failure to do so.
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order to pay rent and did not show sufficient cause for failure to do so.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order to pay rent and did not show sufficient cause for failure to do so.
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order to pay rent and did not show sufficient cause for failure to do so.
Supporting Evidence
In spite of the specific direction of this court and repeated opportunities given, the respondent has not complied with the order of this court.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, an order under section 12(3) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965 is passed as follows: That all further proceedings in RCP 110/2022 are hereby stopped and the respondent is hereby directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule shop room within one month.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Faizal E
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Hajara
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- P P Nizar
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Order in IA.1/2025 dated 19.08.2025
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V. Razal Rahiman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jyothi. R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Muhammed Juraij. K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. B. M. Shamsudheen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule shop room within one month.
Evidence:
Hence, this court is bound to pass an order of eviction under section 12(3) of the Act.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Faizal E et al vs P P Nizar regarding eviction under Rent Control Act
Case Code Year
Case between Faizal E et al vs P P Nizar regarding eviction under Rent Control Act