Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 267/2023

Case between Faizal Abdul Khader et al vs M. Fajer regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF- II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Savitha T.P
Order Date
2025-07-30
Duration
approximately-2 years 23 days
Case Closed
Wed, 07/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Faizal Abdul Khader, working abroad, and his authorized representative Muhammed Sadiq, are plaintiffs seeking injunction against defendant M. Fajer. The case involves disputes over property rights and the defendant's alleged nuisance and trespass.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiffs, granting them a permanent injunction against the defendant from entering their property and causing damage.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant from trespassing into the plaint A schedule property and obstructing the plaintiffs from strengthening the northern side retaining wall.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiffs, granting them a permanent injunction against the defendant from entering their property and causing damage.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs provided convincing evidence demonstrating ownership and the defendant's actions that violated their rights.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs provided convincing evidence demonstrating ownership and the defendant's actions that violated their rights.
Supporting Evidence
The case of the plaintiff stands proved from the affidavit and Exts.A1 to A5 series, C1, C1(a) and C2 series documents. Nothing before this court to disbelieve the evidence put forth by the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: - Defendant is restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint A schedule property and obstructing the plaintiffs from strengthening the northern side retaining wall and also from committing waste and damage to the plaint schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Faizal Abdul Khader
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammed Sadiq
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M. Fajer
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Janmam assignment deed No. 159/2010, Janmam assignment deed No. 168/2010, Janmam assignment deed No. 205/2021, land tax receipt, Location Certificate.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Anil Viswanath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. George P.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is restrained from trespassing into the plaint A schedule property and obstructing the plaintiffs from strengthening the northern side retaining wall.
Evidence:
Defendant is restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint A schedule property and obstructing the plaintiffs from strengthening the northern side retaining wall.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to get costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to get costs of the suit from defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Janmam Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed between Ramlath and Faizal Abdul Khader.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Janmam Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed between Ramlath and Faizal Abdul Khader.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Janmam Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed between Renil Raoof and Faizal Abdul Khader.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued by Village Officer, Kasaba.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Location Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides details of the location of plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report prepared by advocate commissioner.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Sketch prepared by advocate commissioner.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Document Type: Photo
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Photographic evidence pertaining to the case.
Reference:
Ext.C2
Document Type: Photo
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Additional photographic evidence pertaining to the case.
Reference:
Ext.C2(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Faizal Abdul Khader et al vs M. Fajer regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Faizal Abdul Khader et al vs M. Fajer regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Fri, 07/07/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 07/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kolassery Abdurahim vs Kanjirangal Kareem et al regarding property delivery
Rent Control Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. UCO Bank vs Abhinav.K.P et al regarding dismissal of suit.
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Girija et al vs Komalam et al regarding partition
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Fathima Minha.K vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between M Sukumaran vs K. Ahammed et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won