Case Summary
Petition filed by Erachampatt Malik et al under section 11(4)(i) of Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act was dismissed due to absent petitioner and no representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not mentioned
Reason not mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not mentioned
Reason not mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Erachampatt Malik
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- Son of Hamza Haji
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Haneefa
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- Son of Hamza Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manoharan
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- Respondent
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P.P.Basheer
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. I.V.Ratheesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.Vipin
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Not Decided
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Not Decided
Evidence:
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Erachampatt Malik et al vs Manoharan regarding rental dispute
Case Code Year
Case between Erachampatt Malik et al vs Manoharan regarding rental dispute