Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 51 OF 2016

Case between Erachampatt Haseena vs M.Sreenivasan regarding eviction of shop rooms.

Court
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROL OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-08-29
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Erachampatt Haseena filed a petition against M.Sreenivasan seeking eviction from shop rooms she alleges are needed for her proposed business. The respondent contends that he has been running a business in those rooms and disputes the petitioner's claims.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for eviction under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, ordering the respondent to vacate the shop rooms within three months.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the respondent from shop rooms bearing No. 25/131 and 25/139.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for eviction under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, ordering the respondent to vacate the shop rooms within three months.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner has proved bona fide need for the shop rooms for her proposed business.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner has proved bona fide need for the shop rooms for her proposed business.
Supporting Evidence
After considering the evidence, as discussed above, I am of the view that the petitioner has successfully proved that she bona fide require the shop room for her proposed business.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed under S. 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The respondent is directed to give vacant possession of the petition schedule shop rooms bearing No. 25/131 and 25/139 of Tirur Municipality to the petitioner within three months from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Erachampatt Haseena
Party Age
41
Relation
W/o Munhimuhammed @ Bava
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M.Sreenivasan
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o Gopalan
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Tax Assessment Register, Copy of Lawyer Notice dated 28-12-2015, Reply notice dated 16-1-2016.
Defendants Documents
Copy of Profit an Loss Account of the business and Dealer Particulars, Copy of petition in RCP 44/2016, Rent Control Court, Tirur.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.P.P.Basheer
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.I.V.Rathish
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.S.Hariharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner sought eviction of the respondent from the shop rooms.
Evidence:
Therefore, the petitioner is entitled to get an order under S. 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner is entitled to recover the costs of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
So the petitioner is entitled to realise the cost of the proceedings from respondents.
Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Eviction claimed based on the removal of the concrete roof and construction of staircase.
Evidence:
But, the eviction sought on the ground under S. 11 (4) (ii) of the Act is rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of Tax Assessment Register
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was submitted as evidence to support the petitioner's claim regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified copy of Tax Assessment Register
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was submitted as evidence to support the petitioner's claim regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was submitted to show the notice issued to the respondent demanding possession of the shop rooms.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was submitted to show the respondent's reply to the notice by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of Profit and Loss Account of the business and Dealer Particulars
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document was presented to support the respondent's claim regarding his business income.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Copy of petition in RCP
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document references a related Rent Control Petition filed by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Copy of petition in RCP
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document references another related Rent Control Petition filed by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Copy of petition in RCP
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document references another related Rent Control Petition filed by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Copy of Commission report and plan
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document is related to a Commission report in a previous Rent Control Petition.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Copy of Commission report and plan
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document is related to another Commission report in a previous Rent Control Petition.
Reference:
Ext.B6
Document Type: Copy of Commission report and plan
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document is related to yet another Commission report in a previous Rent Control Petition.
Reference:
Ext.B7
Document Type: Copy of Dealer Particulars
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document provides details regarding the respondent's business.
Reference:
Ext.B8
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This document was marked as evidence by the court during the proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Commission Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This document was marked as evidence by the court during the proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.C2

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Bona fide need for own occupation
Case Code
Case between Erachampatt Haseena vs M.Sreenivasan regarding eviction of shop rooms.
Case Code Year
Case between Erachampatt Haseena vs M.Sreenivasan regarding eviction of shop rooms.

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Erachampatt Haleema vs M.Sreenivasan regarding eviction under Section 11 (3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965
RENT CONTROL COURT
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Erachampatt Raseena vs M.Sreenivasan regarding eviction of tenant for bona fide need.
RENT CONTROL COURT
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Muhammed Faizal.P.T et al vs Sakeer Husain regarding rent control
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Rent Control Petition Dismissed
Case between Parayil Muhammedkutty vs Kinassery Parambil Sugathan regarding rental agreement settlement
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Partial
Case between Beeran Haji vs Ali regarding rent control petition
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won