Case Summary
The decree holder is represented by Vipin Raj, the son of the deceased E.P. Raju. The judgment debtor is Omana Raju, the wife of E.P. Raju. The case involves the execution of a decree, which the court has found to be satisfied.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court closed the execution petition after determining that the decree is satisfied.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the decree is satisfied.
The court found that the decree is satisfied.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Decree holder filed memo that decree is satisfied.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence EP is closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vipin Raj
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Omana Raju
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sajan A. Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between E.P. Raju et al vs Omana Raju regarding execution of decree
Case Code Year
Case between E.P. Raju et al vs Omana Raju regarding execution of decree