Case Summary
Enikkutty, the plaintiff, filed a suit for injunction against Ummerkutty, Haneefa, and Fathima, the defendants, which was decreed based on a compromise between the parties.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was decreed based on a compromise between the parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the terms of the compromise is lawful the suit is decreed as per the terms of the compromise.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Enikkutty
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o. Moideen Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ummerkutty
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o. Moideen Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Haneefa
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o. Moideen Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Fathima
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- D/o. Moideen Haji
Plaintiffs Documents
IA. 2455/2016 (Compromise petition)
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Gopikadavath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M.A. Ismail
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Decreed based on compromise terms
Evidence:
Hence the terms of the compromise is lawful the suit is decreed as per the terms of the compromise.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Settlement and Mediation
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Enikkutty vs Ummerkutty et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Enikkutty vs Ummerkutty et al regarding injunction
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement