Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 182/2022

Case between Elizabeth Mathew vs Joe I George et al regarding Partition

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-09-29
Duration
approximately-3 years
Case Closed
Mon, 09/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Elizabeth Mathew is seeking a partition of property originally belonging to Aliyamma Itticheria, which devolved upon her and others. The defendants deny her claim, stating she is not entitled to any share.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit for partition filed by Elizabeth Mathew is dismissed as she was not a party to the earlier partition deed and therefore cannot claim any share in the property.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit for partition filed by Elizabeth Mathew is dismissed as she was not a party to the earlier partition deed and therefore cannot claim any share in the property.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was not a party to the partition deed and hence cannot claim a share.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff could not convince the court that she is entitled to 1/18th share in the plaint schedule property.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Elizabeth Mathew
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Joe I George
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lincy Shiju
Party Age
43
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shiju Joseph
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kunjamma Jacob
Party Age
80
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Liza Abraham
Party Age
55
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Gift Deed no. 33/1977, Copy of Partition Deed no. 1537/1996, Copy of Sale Deed no. 710/2003, Copy of Sale Deed no. 1882/2006
Defendants Documents
Power of Attorney, Sale Deed no. 1882/2006, Tax receipt, Sale Deed no. 710/2003

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Boby George Kurian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kurian George
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sajan A Vargehse
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Archana C Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Blessen C Mathews
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mathew J Elanjickal
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Justy Thomas
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V R Raveendran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Merin Sara Jose
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff claimed a share of 1/18th in the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The plaintiff could not convince the court that she is entitled to 1/18th share in the plaint schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Gift Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Gift Deed no. 33/1977 showing property obtained by Aliyamma Itticheria.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Partition Deed no. 1537/1996 outlining the division of the property among the legal heirs.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Sale Deed no. 710/2003 transferring title and rights of Mariyamma Chacko.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Sale Deed no. 1882/2006 showing transfer of property from the 1st defendant to defendants 2 and 3.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Power of Attorney relating to the property transactions.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Sale Deed no. 1882/2006 pertaining to the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Tax receipt associated with the property.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Sale Deed no. 710/2003 involved in the chain of title.
Reference:
Ext.B4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Elizabeth Mathew vs Joe I George et al regarding Partition
Case Code Year
Case between Elizabeth Mathew vs Joe I George et al regarding Partition

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Thu, 09/29/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 09/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Thressiamma Kunjumon et al vs Pennamma Devasia et al regarding declaration and partition
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between James P.George et al vs Pallikathodu Gramapanchayat et al regarding declaration and injunction
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Lalu Thomas vs V.C. Yohannan regarding fixation of boundary and injunction
Principal Munsiff's Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Aleyamma @ Ajitha vs Ajith P Markose et al regarding recovery of possession.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between C T Muraleedharan Nair vs Savithri Amma et al regarding declaration, recovery of possession and permanent prohibitory injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won