Case Summary
This case involves Electronic Cable Centre as the plaintiff and V.S.T. Mobility Solutions Pvt Ltd and Alwin George as defendants. The suit was dismissed due to lack of representation by the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed for default as there was no representation from the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Electronic Cable Centre
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- V.S.T. Mobility Solutions Pvt Ltd.
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Alwin George
- Relation
- CEO
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- B.Ramachandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Lakshmi P.S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Chritabel D. Avranu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to no representation by the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Electronic Cable Centre vs V.S.T. Mobility Solutions Pvt Ltd et al regarding default dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Electronic Cable Centre vs V.S.T. Mobility Solutions Pvt Ltd et al regarding default dismissal