Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 891/2023

Case between Electrogen Industries vs Electrical Inspector et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-07-07
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Electrogen Industries as the plaintiff and several defendants including the Electrical Inspector and others. The plaintiff was not present during the proceedings, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence. The case was dismissed with costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence. The case was dismissed with costs.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Plaintiff no representation. Defendant represented. Listed case. Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence. Taken up at roll call and thereafter. Dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Electrogen Industries
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Electrical Inspector
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri.Santhosh Kumar
Party Age
50
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri. Venu
Party Age
45
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chief Electrical Inspector
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
State of Kerala
Relation
represented by District Collector
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sabu P. Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anil Prasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Tony George Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Beyone Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arya K.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.S Muhammed Shefin
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Gayathri J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jolly George
Appearance Type
Government Pleader

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff no representation. Defendant represented. Listed case. Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence. Taken up at roll call and thereafter. Dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Electrogen Industries vs Electrical Inspector et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Electrogen Industries vs Electrical Inspector et al regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won