Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 05/2023

Case between E.G Ganesh vs Sanmargapradeepam Yogam et al regarding non-payment of court fee

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-06-28
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves E.G Ganesh as the plaintiff against Sanmargapradeepam Yogam and two other defendants regarding non-payment of the court fee. The plaintiff was repeatedly absent, leading to the dismissal of the case.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's non-payment of balance court fee and continuous absence. Thus, the case was dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's non-payment of balance court fee and continuous absence. Thus, the case was dismissed.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to represent the case and did not pay the necessary court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to represent the case and did not pay the necessary court fees.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff no representation. Defendants represented. No balance court fee seen remitted inspite of specific direction.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the plaint is rejected for non- payment of balance court fee. Pending IA’s closed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
E.G Ganesh
Party Age
58
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sanmargapradeepam Yogam
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M.K Pushapangathan
Party Age
74
Relation
Father’s Name not known
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M.K Ramesh Babu
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o. Krishnan Kutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S.K. Ajayakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C. Dilip
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rajagopalan A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Prabhu Murali Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Viswanadh Salish
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Amal A.R.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The plaint is rejected for non-payment of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Hence the plaint is rejected for non- payment of balance court fee.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between E.G Ganesh vs Sanmargapradeepam Yogam et al regarding non-payment of court fee
Case Code Year
Case between E.G Ganesh vs Sanmargapradeepam Yogam et al regarding non-payment of court fee

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won