Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.620/2012

Case between Edward Serling et al vs Ferman et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-03-05
Duration
approximately-13 years 0 days
Case Code No.
620
Case Closed
Wed, 03/05/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, including Edward Serling and others, filed a suit against defendants Ferman and others. The court dismissed the case for default due to the continuous absence of the plaintiffs.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for default because the plaintiffs were absent and had no representation during the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default because the plaintiffs were absent and had no representation during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was continuously absent, leading to a dismissal for default.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was continuously absent, leading to a dismissal for default.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff is continuously absent, leading to a dismissal for default.

Judgment Evidence:

The plaintiff is continuously absent. Hence, the suit is dismissed for default. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Edward Serling
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Elizabath Bella
Party Age
58
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nancy Zavier
Party Age
54
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Biyatris
Party Age
59
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jose. D. Britto
Party Age
31
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ferman
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Cleetus @ Baby
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Clair Lali
Party Age
50
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rosemarry
Party Age
63
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Babu Christy
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Poonthura Tharif. B
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.B.Jayachandran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is continuously absent. Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2012

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 03/05/2012 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 03/05/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won