Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 154 OF 2015

Case between Edayath Abdul Majeed vs Parnnangadi Sreenivasan regarding money realization

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-12-15
Duration
2 years
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff filed a suit against the defendant seeking the realization of money lent along with interest and costs. The defendant borrowed gold from the plaintiff for investment but failed to repay the amount.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendant to pay Rs. 8,80,500 along with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Realization of Rs. 8,80,500 with interest at 6% per annum
Case Type
Civil Suit - Money Realisation
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff presented cogent and reliable evidence proving the loan amount and default in repayment by the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

The plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Edayath Abdul Majeed (51 years) Kanmanam amsom, Varanakkara desom, Post Kanmanam, Pin: 676 551, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Parnnangadi Sreenivasan (55 years) Thrikandiyur amsom, Annara desom, Post Tirur Tirur Taluk, Pin: 676 101

Reliefs

Relief Type: Money Realisation
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Realization of Rs. 8,80,500 along with interest at 6% per annum
Evidence:
The plaintiff presented cogent and reliable evidence of loan agreement and default in repayment by the defendant.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant
Evidence:
Not mentioned in the judgment

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of the loan agreement between plaintiff and defendant
Reference:
1-1-2014
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Intimation of return of gold and demand for repayment from defendant
Reference:
11-04-2015

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Mon, 12/14/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases