Case Summary
Edamarathil Velu filed a suit seeking injunction against multiple defendants. The matter was settled, and the suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not applicable
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed as not pressed as the matter was settled.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for Injunction. Matter settled. Statement filed for not pressing the suit. Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Edamarathil Velu
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- Son of Velayudhan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Paleri Kunhimuhammed's son Musthafa
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- Son of Paleri Kunhimuhammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Illikkal Veeran Haji's son; Khalid
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- Son of Illikkal Veeran Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kothangath Parambil Kunhimuhammed's son; Mujeeb Rahman
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- Son of Kothangath Parambil Kunhimuhammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kodiyeri Kalathil Viswanathan
- Relation
- Son of Krishna Menon
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Indira Devi
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- Wife of Kodiyeri Kalathil Radhakrishnan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Parvathy
- Party Age
- 14
- Relation
- Daughter of Kodiyeri Kalathil Radhakrishnan and Indira Devi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Gopika
- Party Age
- 12
- Relation
- Daughter of Kodiyeri Kalathil Radhakrishnan and Indira Devi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Cheriyedath Sidheekh
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- Son of Kunhimuhammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thottiyil Hameed
- Relation
- Son of Bapputty
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.M.Neelakandan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.A.Krishnakumar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Suit for injunction
Evidence:
Matter settled. Statement filed for not pressing the suit. Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Settlement and Mediation
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Edamarathil Velu vs Paleri Kunhimuhammed et al regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Edamarathil Velu vs Paleri Kunhimuhammed et al regarding Injunction