Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP 87/2022

Case between EDACHERI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. vs 1ANOOP DAS et al regarding execution of decree debt.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-11-13
Duration
approximately-3 years 9 months
Case Code No.
87
Case Closed
Thu, 11/13/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Edacheri Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., is seeking to execute a decree against the respondents for unpaid debts. The judgment debtors have acknowledged their earnings but have failed to pay the owed amount, leading to the request for their arrest.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The execution petition has been allowed, enabling the arrest of the judgment debtors due to their refusal to pay the decree debt despite having sufficient means.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Issue arrest warrant against judgment debtors.
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition has been allowed, enabling the arrest of the judgment debtors due to their refusal to pay the decree debt despite having sufficient means.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner proved that the respondents had sufficient means to pay the decree debt but refused to do so.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner proved that the respondents had sufficient means to pay the decree debt but refused to do so.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner/decree holder has succeeded in proving that respondents/judgment debtors has and has had since the date of decree means to pay off the decree debt and refused and has refused to pay the same.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, EP is allowed as follows: 1.Issue arrest warrant against judgment debtors.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
EDACHERI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
1ANOOP DAS
Party Age
29
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
2SUMESH
Party Age
31
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
3RIJEESH
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Petitioner
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Anoop
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Petitioner
Advocate Name
Sri. P. K. Ramachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Petitioner
Advocate Name
Sri. P. M. Previn
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Petitioner
Advocate Name
Smt. Amaya. V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Petitioner
Advocate Name
Smt. C. M. Hema Chandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Anfas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Execution Petition allowed to issue arrest warrant against judgment debtors.
Evidence:
Hence, Execution Petition can be allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2022

Case Flags

Imprisonment Involved
Arrest Involved

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District, Kerala State
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Sat, 01/01/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 11/13/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Edacheri Service Co Operative Bank Ltd vs Rajeevan et al regarding execution petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between IRINGANNOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. vs 1SHIBINRAJ, SREEKESH. T regarding execution petition for debt realization
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between IRINGANNOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. et al vs SREEKESH. T regarding execution of decree debt.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Abdul Rasheed MV et al regarding execution petition for arrest and detention
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between IRINGANNOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. vs NISAR et al regarding execution petition.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won