Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.265/2023

Case between E P Devassy et al vs Mercy Joseph et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany.
Order Date
2024-12-05
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs E P Devassy, Siby Antony, and Giby Antony filed a suit against the defendants Mercy Joseph, Paul Joseph, Siji Joseph, Saju Joseph, and Soji Tomy. The court found the plaintiffs absent and dismissed the suit for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs and their representation, concluding that they did not intend to proceed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs and their representation, concluding that they did not intend to proceed.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs were absent and did not intend to proceed with the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs were absent and did not intend to proceed with the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The court found the plaintiffs absent, stating that they did not attend or show any intention to move forward with the case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence Court is satisfied that plaintiff is not intend to proceed with suit. Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
E P Devassy
Party Age
76
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Siby Antony
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Giby Antony
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mercy Joseph
Party Age
73
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Paul Joseph
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Siji Joseph
Party Age
51
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saju Joseph
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Soji Tomy
Party Age
46
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Blossom Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rameez Nooh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence Court is satisfied that plaintiff is not intend to proceed with suit. Suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between E P Devassy et al vs Mercy Joseph et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between E P Devassy et al vs Mercy Joseph et al regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won