Case Summary
The case involves E K Sunil Kumar as the plaintiff requesting a temporary prohibitory injunction against the defendants, including P K Asha. The plaintiff claims that without the injunction, he would suffer irreparable injury.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has granted an interim injunction preventing the defendants from dispossessing the plaintiff from the property in question. The plaintiff has to comply with the process as directed by the court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the plaintiff had made out a prima facie case for granting the injunction and that irreparable injury would occur without it.
The court found that the plaintiff had made out a prima facie case for granting the injunction and that irreparable injury would occur without it.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the plaintiff had made out a prima facie case for granting the injunction and that irreparable injury would occur without it.
The court found that the plaintiff had made out a prima facie case for granting the injunction and that irreparable injury would occur without it.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a prima facie case and if order of temporary injunction is not granted, irreparable injury is likely to be caused to the petitioner.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order of interim injunction is passed restraining the respondents and their men from forcibly dispossessing the petitioner/plaintiff from the pliant schedule property, except through due process of law.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- E K Sunil Kumar
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- P K Asha
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anil Kumar
- Party Age
- 50
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Leo Pius
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Affidavit supporting the request for injunction.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P Sathisan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shibu B S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Alvin Jewel S S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Vidhya T U
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Abhirami S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Antija James
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Dijil P S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Order of interim injunction restraining the respondents and their men from forcibly dispossessing the petitioner/plaintiff from the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
Hence an order of interim injunction is passed restraining the respondents and their men from forcibly dispossessing the petitioner/plaintiff from the plaint schedule property, except through due process of law.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between E K Sunil Kumar vs P K Asha et al regarding temporary injunction
Case Code Year
Case between E K Sunil Kumar vs P K Asha et al regarding temporary injunction