Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1128/2025

Case between E K Sunil Kumar vs P K Asha et al regarding temporary injunction

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-11-04
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves E K Sunil Kumar as the plaintiff requesting a temporary prohibitory injunction against the defendants, including P K Asha. The plaintiff claims that without the injunction, he would suffer irreparable injury.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has granted an interim injunction preventing the defendants from dispossessing the plaintiff from the property in question. The plaintiff has to comply with the process as directed by the court.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the plaintiff had made out a prima facie case for granting the injunction and that irreparable injury would occur without it.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order of interim injunction is passed restraining the respondents and their men from forcibly dispossessing the petitioner/plaintiff from the pliant schedule property, except through due process of law.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

E K Sunil Kumar (57 years) Kulangathara House, Chilavannur, Water Land Road, Kadavanthra P O, Ernakulam - 682 020

Defendants

P K Asha (55 years) Flat No. A1, Kakkanad, Near Galaxy Edifice Flat, Khadar Haji Road, Thirkkakara P O, Vazhakkala, Kanayanoor Taluk, Ernakulam District - 682 021 Anil Kumar (50 years) C/o P K Asha, "Sharanya" Beside "Fusion Signature", Chalikavattom, Vennala, Ernakulam District - 682 028 Leo Pius (50 years) Kuttantharappel House, Athirumpuzha Post, Athirumpuzha Village, Kottayam Taluk, Kottayam District, Pin - 386 562

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Order of interim injunction restraining the respondents and their men from forcibly dispossessing the petitioner/plaintiff from the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
Hence an order of interim injunction is passed restraining the respondents and their men from forcibly dispossessing the petitioner/plaintiff from the plaint schedule property, except through due process of law.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases