Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
E.P. No. 147/2022

Case between E 265 th Service Co-Operative Bank Marambilly vs Anwar regarding enforcement of decree.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-08-04
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves E 265 th Service Co-Operative Bank Marambilly as the decree holder and Anwar as the judgment debtor. The court ordered the remittance of Special Appeal and Temporary Appeal and issued a committal warrant for Anwar's incarceration.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has ordered the remittance of Special Appeal and Temporary Appeal and instructed to send the judgment debtor, Anwar, to prison for a duration of 3 months.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Enforcement Proceedings
Final Judgment
No
The court has ordered the remittance of Special Appeal and Temporary Appeal and instructed to send the judgment debtor, Anwar, to prison for a duration of 3 months.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The judgment debtor did not express intent to file for insolvency, leading to the enforcement of the decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The judgment debtor did not express intent to file for insolvency, leading to the enforcement of the decree.
Supporting Evidence
But he did not stated that he is intenting to filed such petition. Hence DH shall remit SA and TA.

Judgment Evidence:

JD arrested and produced. He is informed about his right to be declared as insolvent. But he did not stated that he is intenting to filed such petition. Hence DH shall remit SA and TA. So as to sent the JD to prison (3 months as per order). Hence deposit SA and TA.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
E 265 th Service Co-Operative Bank Marambilly
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anwar
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.N Madhava Pai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K. Balachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Maitheen M. Pareeth
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Imprisonment
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Sent the Judgement Debtor to prison for 3 months.
Evidence:
So as to sent the JD to prison (3 months as per order).

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Enforcement Proceedings
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between E 265 th Service Co-Operative Bank Marambilly vs Anwar regarding enforcement of decree.
Case Code Year
Case between E 265 th Service Co-Operative Bank Marambilly vs Anwar regarding enforcement of decree.

Case Flags

Imprisonment Involved
Arrest Involved
Imprisonment Duration
3 months

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between St. George Chits (Karakattu) Pvt.Ltd. vs Revathy Rajesh Kumar @ Revathy Sajikumar, Rajesh Kumar P. S regarding enforcement of decree
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Enforcement Proceedings Defendant Won
Case between Infant Jesus Church represented by Fr. Deglus Pinheiro @ Douglas vs Peer Mohammed Khan regarding E.P.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Enforcement Proceedings Plaintiff Won
Case between Kuruppampady Service Co-operative Bank No. E-257 vs Thankappan P.A. regarding Enforcement Proceedings
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Enforcement Proceedings Defendant Won
Case between Cheranalloor Service Co-operative Bank No. 2417 vs Ponnappan Karthika et al regarding E.P. No. 219/2022
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Enforcement Proceedings Defendant Won
Case between Subitha Leasing Company Limited vs Ganeshan et al regarding enforcement proceedings.
Munsiff Magistrate AT Tirur
Enforcement Proceedings Plaintiff Won