Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 143/2020

Case between Dynamic Architectural Hardware vs Shri. Manoj Bhaskar regarding realization of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-01-15
Duration
approximately-6 years 9 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Dynamic Architectural Hardware is suing Shri. Manoj Bhaskar for non-payment of Rs. 33,136 for hardware items purchased on credit. The defendant did not file a written statement and was set exparte.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover Rs. 49,559 from the defendant along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs. 49,559 from the defendant with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover Rs. 49,559 from the defendant along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved their case through unchallenged oral testimony and documentary evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved their case through unchallenged oral testimony and documentary evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Having considered the unchallenged oral testimony of PW1 and Ext.A1 to A4, it is found that the plaintiff has proved his case and therefore, he is entitled to get a decree as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs of the plaintiff as follows.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dynamic Architectural Hardware
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shri. Manoj Bhaskar
Plaintiffs Documents
Invoice No.651 evidencing the sale of hardware items, certified ledger account statement, copy of lawyer notice, A/D card.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Paul C. Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.R. Anil Kumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M. Aravindakshan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs. 49,559 from the defendant along with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed with costs of the plaintiff as follows. The plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs.49,559 from the defendant with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter, 6% interest per annum till the date of realization from the defendant and his assets both movable and immovable.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences the sale of hardware items on credit by the plaintiff to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified ledger account statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document substantiates the case of the plaintiff regarding the amount due from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows that the plaintiff issued a notice seeking payment from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: A/d Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences the receipt of the lawyer notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Dynamic Architectural Hardware vs Shri. Manoj Bhaskar regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Dynamic Architectural Hardware vs Shri. Manoj Bhaskar regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 04/18/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won