Case Summary
D.V.Arun, the petitioner and landlord, filed for eviction against M.S.Ajithkumar and Vipin Vishnu. The petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the eviction petition as not pressed by the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
The petition was not pursued by the petitioner.
The petition was not pursued by the petitioner.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The petition was not pressed by the petitioner.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- D.V.Arun
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M.S.Ajithkumar
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vipin Vishnu
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- R.Geetha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sreelatha.S.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- N.R.Roy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petition not pressed for eviction.
Evidence:
Hence petition dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Eviction
Case Code
Case between D.V.Arun vs M.S.Ajithkumar et al regarding eviction.
Case Code Year
Case between D.V.Arun vs M.S.Ajithkumar et al regarding eviction.