Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1330/2018

Case between Dr.Prakash Chandran Arackal vs Rotary International et al regarding declaration and injunction.

Court
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-06-03
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Dr. Prakash Chandran Arackal filed a suit for declaring a decision by the Board of Directors of Rotary International as illegal and to restrain the defendants from enforcing it. The parties reached a settlement and mutually agreed to drop all charges.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as withdrawn after the plaintiff agreed to withdraw the suit following a settlement between the parties. No costs were ordered.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Dr.Prakash Chandran Arackal (57 years years) Kammathiparambil House, House No.36, Rajeev Nagar, Puthukkalavattom, Elamakkara, Ernakulam, Pin – 682 026.

Defendants

Rotary International (Age not specified years) 2119, Harrison Street Evanton, Chicago IL 60201, U.S.A. Rotary International South Asia Office (Age not specified years) Pullman/Novotel Commercial Tower, First Floor Asset No.2, Hospitality District, Acrocity(Near 1G1 Airport), New Delhi – 110037. District governor, Rotary International District 3201 (Age not specified years) 14 Allwin Nagar, Sungam Bye-Pass Ramanathapuram.P.O., Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, Pin – 641045.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought a declaration that the decision in October 2018 taken by the Board of Directors is ultravires and patently illegal.
Evidence:
The suit is filed for declaring that the decision in October 2018 taken by the Board of Directors and the report of enquiry panel referred to in the said decision are ultravires and patently illegal and the same is not binding on the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from enforcing the said decision.
Evidence:
The suit is filed for...a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from enforcing the said decision.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 10/01/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases