Case Summary
Dr. Prakash Chandran Arackal filed a suit for declaring a decision by the Board of Directors of Rotary International as illegal and to restrain the defendants from enforcing it. The parties reached a settlement and mutually agreed to drop all charges.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as withdrawn after the plaintiff agreed to withdraw the suit following a settlement between the parties. No costs were ordered.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, Suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Dr.Prakash Chandran Arackal
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rotary International
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rotary International South Asia Office
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- District governor, Rotary International District 3201
- Relation
- represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.S Manu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- S.K Premraj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anoop Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Siddharth Dutta
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Shajna.M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ahamed Fazil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Firoz.K.M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Muhammed Noushiq.P.C
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Dipu james
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ahamed Fazil
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Declaration
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought a declaration that the decision in October 2018 taken by the Board of Directors is ultravires and patently illegal.
Evidence:
The suit is filed for declaring that the decision in October 2018 taken by the Board of Directors and the report of enquiry panel referred to in the said decision are ultravires and patently illegal and the same is not binding on the plaintiff.
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from enforcing the said decision.
Evidence:
The suit is filed for...a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from enforcing the said decision.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Dr.Prakash Chandran Arackal vs Rotary International et al regarding declaration and injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Dr.Prakash Chandran Arackal vs Rotary International et al regarding declaration and injunction.
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement