Case Summary
Dr.Nazeerkhan and M.Jasmin Nazeer are the plaintiffs, while Sabira.A.R and Mohammed Haleef are the defendants. The case revolves around an application that was heard and decided in favor of the plaintiffs due to the defendants' absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the plaintiff's application due to the absence of the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Heard. Defendant not entered appearance and no objection filed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence I am inclined to allow the present application and extent order in IA.1/2025, until further orders.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Dr.Nazeerkhan
- Party Age
- 62
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M.Jasmin Nazeer
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sabira.A.R
- Party Age
- 45
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mohammed Haleef
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.A.Abdul Kharim
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Asha.M.George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Sameer Kharim
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.O.M.Jyothikumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.S.Nisha
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025