Case Summary
The petitioners, Dr. Saramma K. Daniel and Mary Cherian, filed a rent control petition against M/s. City Collections. The matter was settled, and the court accepted the withdrawal memo.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the rent control petition as not pressed after the matter was settled between the parties.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
The counsel for petitioner filed a withdrawal memo stating that matter settled. Memo accepted. Rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Dr. Saramma K. Daniel
- Party Age
- 91
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mary Cherian
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s. City Collections
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Memo of costs, Rent control petition
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sreejith S., Nair, Bincy Jose & Jisha Juslin
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Kurian Antony Edassery & Ann Emil Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Dr. Saramma K. Daniel et al vs M/s. City Collections regarding rent control petition
Case Code Year
Case between Dr. Saramma K. Daniel et al vs M/s. City Collections regarding rent control petition
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement