Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 899/2023

Case between Dr. Santhosh Mathew et al vs The Skyline Zircon Apartments Owners Association regarding suit dismissal

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-10-04
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Dr. Santhosh Mathew and others against The Skyline Zircon Apartments Owners Association. The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
The defendant succeeded because the plaintiff was absent.
Why Defendant Won:
The defendant succeeded because the plaintiff was absent.
Supporting Evidence
Defendant represented. Plaintiff absent. No representation. Not present or ready for evidence in listed case.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed. (Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 04th day of October, 2024).

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dr. Santhosh Mathew
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mehar Sadique
Party Age
20
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Roy Mathew
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Skyline Zircon Apartments Owners Association
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Pamala P. K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A. S Dileep
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P. Binod
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.Y Sudheendran
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Suseela Dileep
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sudeep Aravind Panicker
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Dr. Santhosh Mathew et al vs The Skyline Zircon Apartments Owners Association regarding suit dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Dr. Santhosh Mathew et al vs The Skyline Zircon Apartments Owners Association regarding suit dismissal

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won