Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 335/2020

Case between Dr. PK Hamza et al vs Thrikkakara GCDA House Owners' Association et al regarding a civil suit

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-08-08
Duration
approximately-4 years 0 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, including Dr. PK Hamza and others, brought a civil suit against the defendants, which include the Thrikkakara GCDA House Owners' Association and its officers. The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiffs not being ready for evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the plaintiffs' case due to their unpreparedness for evidence. The suit was marked as dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs were not ready to present evidence as required.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Dr. PK Hamza (75 years) Rahmatullah House, Ponjassery P O. Vengola, Ernakuam - 683 547 Geetha Murali (56 years) MIG-49, Kunnumpurath House, Surabhi Nagar, Kakkanad P.O, Ernakulam District, Pin 682 030 Anuja Raveendran (32 years) Geeth House, Nampillil Compound, Surabhi Nagar, Kakkanad P.O, Ernakulam District, Pin- 682 030 Pratheesh Thomas (40 years) Kurusumoottil house, Perumballoor P.O, Moovatupuzha, Ernakulam District, Pin- 686 673

Defendants

Thrikkakara GCDA House Owners' Association (Age not specified years) 10/882-A. Surabhi Nagar, Kakkanad P.O, Ernakulam District, Pin- 682 030 G Motilal (55 years) MIG-118, Surabhi Nagar, Kakkanad P.O, Ernakulam District, Pin- 682 030 Dr. Terry Thomas (40 years) HIG-20, Surabhi Nagar, Kakkanad P.O, Ernakulam District, Pin-682 030 Babu Abraham (51 years) MIG-74, Surabhi Nagar Kakkanad P.O. Ernakulam District, Pin 682 030

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff not being ready for evidence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff not ready for evidence in listed case which had been listed twice. Hence suit dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 08/08/2020 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

House Owners' Association

Similar Cases