Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.500/2021

Case between Dr. Manoj.T.Pillai et al vs Dr. Rijo Mathew et al regarding suit filed under Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure.

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-02-14
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, a group of doctors, filed a suit against the defendants for reasons not specified in the document. On the date of the hearing, the plaintiffs' counsel indicated that the suit was not pressed, leading to its dismissal.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff's counsel stated it was not pressed. No costs were assigned.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff's counsel stated it was not pressed. No costs were assigned.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed as not pressed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dr. Manoj.T.Pillai
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o A. Thankappan Pillai
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dr. Suresh Babu.K.
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o P. Krishnadas
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dr. Jayasree.L
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o Dr. B.Sreekumar
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dr. Vijayan
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o Kandar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dr. Rijo Mathew
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o C.P. Mathew
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dr. M.C.J. Prakash
Party Age
70
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dr. Govindan Nair
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kerala Chapter of Indian Radiological & Imaging Association
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Tinu Treasa
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Leejoy Mathew.V.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sabu.S.(Kallaramoola)
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreekumar.T.M.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
C.R. Syamkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Suneethi.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit dismissed as not pressed
Evidence:
memo stating that suit not pressed. Suit dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Dr. Manoj.T.Pillai et al vs Dr. Rijo Mathew et al regarding suit filed under Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure.
Case Code Year
Case between Dr. Manoj.T.Pillai et al vs Dr. Rijo Mathew et al regarding suit filed under Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 02/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won