Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.1070/2020

Case between Dr. G.S. Vijayakrishnan et al vs V. Sumathi et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-02-04
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Dr. G.S. Vijayakrishnan and Dr. M.C. Sathya Bhama filed a suit against V. Sumathi, Renjana, and Manoj. The case was dismissed as the plaintiffs were not present and did not provide sufficient reason.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence and lack of sufficient reasoning for their non-appearance.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence and lack of sufficient reasoning for their non-appearance.
Key Reasoning:
The court found no sufficient reason stated for the plaintiffs' absence.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found no sufficient reason stated for the plaintiffs' absence.
Supporting Evidence
No sufficient reason stated hence IA 7/2024 dismissed. It is seen that case was removed from list and relisted today as per order in IA 6/2024.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit stands dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dr. G.S. Vijayakrishnan
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dr. M.C. Sathya Bhama
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V. Sumathi
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Renjana
Party Age
35
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manoj
Party Age
40
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. K.Kusumam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.Kalesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K.O. Asokan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. N.R. Suresh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit stands dismissed as plaintiff not present.
Evidence:
As plaintiff not present no sufficient reason stated. Suit stands dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Dr. G.S. Vijayakrishnan et al vs V. Sumathi et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Dr. G.S. Vijayakrishnan et al vs V. Sumathi et al regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreedevi vs Mahesh regarding realization of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Application in Pauper Suit Defendant Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between R.Vijayakumar vs Arun Mohan regarding possession of petition schedule building
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ashraf Ali vs Badhusha regarding rent control petition
COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won