Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 422/2024

Case between Dr. Davis J. Akkara vs Paulose Thoma regarding a suit abatement.

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-08-20
Duration
approximately-1 year 2 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Dr. Davis J. Akkara filed a suit against Paulose Thoma which was subject to abatement. The court found that the suit had already abated and dismissed it.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as abated due to lack of timely action from the plaintiff’s side.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed because it had abated and no petitions to set aside the abatement were filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is dismissed as abated.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Dr. Davis J. Akkara (66 years years) XLI/3212, RRA20, Akkara House, Poothullil Lane, Off Old Railway station Road, Thrikkanarvattom Desom, PIN-682018 Ernakulam village, Kanayannoor Taluk, Ernakulam District

Defendants

Paulose Thoma (62 years years) Palatty House, Manjapra Vadakkumbhagam Desom, PIN -683581. Manjapra village, Aluva Taluk, Ernakulam District

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed as abated.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed as abated.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases