Case Summary
Dr. Davis J. Akkara filed a suit against Paulose Thoma which was subject to abatement. The court found that the suit had already abated and dismissed it.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as abated due to lack of timely action from the plaintiff’s side.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed because it had abated and no petitions to set aside the abatement were filed.
The suit was dismissed because it had abated and no petitions to set aside the abatement were filed.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The suit had already abated and no petitions to set aside abatement were seen filed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed as abated.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Dr. Davis J. Akkara
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Paulose Thoma
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Litto Palathingal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.M. Baby
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Judy Jose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jerin George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sreekarthik Sivaganga
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed as abated.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed as abated.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Dr. Davis J. Akkara vs Paulose Thoma regarding a suit abatement.
Case Code Year
Case between Dr. Davis J. Akkara vs Paulose Thoma regarding a suit abatement.