Case Summary
Diya Fathima, a minor represented by her guardian mother Habeena, filed a suit for declaration against Noufal Puthanpeediyekkal, Latha Prakash, and Unnikrishnan. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Declaration
Final Judgment
No
The suit for declaration was dismissed as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for declaration. Suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Diya Fathima
- Party Age
- 12
- Relation
- Minor, represented by guardian mother
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Noufal Puthanpeediyekkal
- Party Age
- 45
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Latha Prakash
- Party Age
- 42
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Unnikrishnan
- Party Age
- 52
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M. Sreeprakash
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Praveen
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Declaration
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Suit for declaration
Evidence:
Suit for declaration. Suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Declaration
Category
Settlement and Mediation
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Diya Fathima et al vs Noufal Puthanpeediyekkal et al regarding declaration
Case Code Year
Case between Diya Fathima et al vs Noufal Puthanpeediyekkal et al regarding declaration