Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 90/2025

Case between Dimple Paul vs Mrs. Pushpi Thomas et al regarding temporary injunction

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-07-14
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Dimple Paul is the plaintiff seeking a temporary injunction against Mrs. Pushpi Thomas and others. The plaintiff alleges unlawful eviction attempts despite paying rent for the leased premises.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court extended the temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff for two weeks, providing an opportunity to pay the outstanding rent. If the plaintiff fails to comply, the injunction will be vacated.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Extended the ad interim order of injunction for two weeks
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff showed a prima facie case and potential for irreparable injury without an injunction.

Judgment Evidence:

The ad interim order of injunction granted in favour of the plaintiff is extended for a period of two weeks from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Dimple Paul (49 years years) 35/2063 C, Pazhayampally House, Pipeline Road, Palarivattom Desom, Poonithura Village, Kanayannur Thaluk, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 025

Defendants

Mrs. Pushpi Thomas (74 years years) House No.32/641 A, Mettekkat House, Vyttila Road, P.O.Palarivattom, Palarivattom Desom, Edappally South Village, Kanayannur Thaluk, Ernakulam District, Pin- 682 024 Mr. Siju (52 years years) House No.32/641 A, Mettekkat House, Vyttila Road, P.O.Palarivattom, Palarivattom Desom, Edappally South Village, Kanayannur Thaluk, Ernakulam District, Pin- 682 024 Smt. Nitha Siju (46 years years) House No.32/641 A, Mettekkat House, Vyttila Road, P.O.Palarivattom, Palarivattom Desom, Poonithura Village, Kanayannur Thaluk, Ernakulam District, Pin- 682 025

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought an order of temporary injunction to prevent eviction.
Evidence:
The ad interim order of injunction granted in favour of the plaintiff is extended for a period of two weeks from today.
Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
The request to vacate the interim order of injunction filed by the defendants.
Evidence:
The balance of convenience therefore would favour the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Leave and License Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document is relevant as it establishes the terms of the lease between the plaintiff and the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document is used to demonstrate the payment history relevant to the rent agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases