Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 90/2025

Case between Dimple Paul vs Mrs. Pushpi Thomas et al regarding mediation settlement.

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2026-01-16
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff Dimple Paul is involved in a case against defendants Mrs. Pushpi Thomas and others regarding a mediation settlement. The terms were found lawful and incorporated into the decree.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found the terms of the mediation lawful and incorporated them into the decree, allowing for the court fee paid to be refunded.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Mediation Agreement shall form part of decree; Court fee paid shall be refunded.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found the terms of the mediation lawful and incorporated them into the decree, allowing for the court fee paid to be refunded.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Terms found lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Closed incorporating terms of mediation as part of decree. Mediation Agreement shall form part of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dimple Paul
Party Age
49
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mrs. Pushpi Thomas
Party Age
74
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Siju
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Smt. Nitha Siju
Party Age
46
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V. N Haridas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saifudeen T.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shameera B
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nimishamol Sasidharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sibi Karun
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
R. Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
George Sunny Menachery
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Settled in Mediation. Terms found lawful. Closed incorporating terms of mediation as part of decree.
Evidence:
Settled in Mediation. Terms found lawful. Closed incorporating terms of mediation as part of decree.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Court fee paid shall be refunded.
Evidence:
Court fee paid shall be refunded.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Dimple Paul vs Mrs. Pushpi Thomas et al regarding mediation settlement.
Case Code Year
Case between Dimple Paul vs Mrs. Pushpi Thomas et al regarding mediation settlement.

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 01/01/2026 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/21/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won