Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 233/2022

Case between Dilip Stephen vs Arun Sundar regarding Suit dismissal

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-03-14
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Dilip Stephen, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Arun Sundar but was absent during the hearing. The court dismissed the suit due to lack of representation and failure to serve summons.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and no steps were taken to serve summons to the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence and lack of representation led to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Dilip Stephen (53 years) Pachikara House, Nadukandam, Kolani P.O, Thodupuzha, Idukki – 685 584

Defendants

Arun Sundar (Age not specified years) ‘Sree Chitra’, Keston Enclave, Keston Road, Kowdiar, Trivandrum – 695 003

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed due to plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. No representation. No steps taken as ordered to issue and serve summons to Defendant. Suit dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases