Case Summary
The complainant Dileepkumar M G filed a case against the accused Sandhya Aji under the Negotiable Instruments Act. Both parties were absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the case against the accused due to the complainant's absence and lack of intent to prosecute.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant was absent and did not intend to prosecute the matter.
The complainant was absent and did not intend to prosecute the matter.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
From received, I am satisfied complainant is not intended to prosecute matters and non causes shown for non appearance of complainant.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence complainant is dismissed under section 256 Cr.pc.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Dileepkumar M G
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sandhya Aji
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- E M Suresh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Deepthi G Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
S.T.
Case Code Year
2023
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act