Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 142/ 2024

Case between The Dhanlaxmi Bank Ltd. vs Girija R et al regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-06-13
Duration
approximately-6 years 3 months
Case Closed
Fri, 06/13/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Dhanlaxmi Bank Ltd. filed a suit against Girija R and Renjith M for recovery of a loan amount. The defendants failed to repay the borrowed amount despite repeated renewals and notices.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding loan amount with interest. The defendants were found liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants shall pay Rs.5,23,546.13/- with interest @12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding loan amount with interest. The defendants were found liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff established a clear case of loan default backed by documentation.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff established a clear case of loan default backed by documentation.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.5,23,546.13/- with interest from defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1) Defendants shall pay Rs.5,23,546.13/- with interest @12% per annum...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
The Dhanlaxmi Bank Ltd.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Girija R
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o Renjith M
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Renjith M
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o Madhavakurup
Plaintiffs Documents
Exts.A1 to A20 including loan documents, sanction letters, and statement of accounts.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sijo George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T Saji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Raghunath K R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants shall pay Rs.5,23,546.13/- with interest.
Evidence:
Defendants shall pay Rs.5,23,546.13/- (Rupees Five lakhs twenty three thousand five hundred and forty six and thirteen paise only) with interest @12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants shall be personally and their assets shall also be liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Evidence:
Defendants shall be personally and their assets shall also be liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sanction intimation letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows that the defendant availed cash credit for Rs.5,00,000/- with 12.80% interest per annum.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates that the defendant executed a demand promissory note for Rs.5,00,000/-.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Other agreements
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreements executed by the defendants in favor of plaintiff with respect to the loan amount.
Reference:
Exts.A4, A5, A6
Document Type: Consent letter for renewal of limits
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows that the defendant renewed the cash credit for Rs.5,00,000/- for working capital expenditure.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Liability
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of liability executed by the first defendant in favor of plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows that the defendant did not make repayments as agreed.
Reference:
Ext.A18
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Lawyer notice issued to defendants demanding the outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A15

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between The Dhanlaxmi Bank Ltd. vs Girija R et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between The Dhanlaxmi Bank Ltd. vs Girija R et al regarding realization of money

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Financial liability - dishonoured cheque

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 03/25/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 06/13/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Dasan P.K. et al regarding Realization Of Money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between HDFC Bank Limited vs Baby P C et al regarding non-repayment of home loan
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Johnson N.D regarding loan repayment
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbasree Div 7 NHG 16 Jyothis et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shamna Basheer, Aysha Basheer regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won