Case Summary
The plaintiff, Devidas D Pisharady, is claiming an outstanding amount from the defendant, Harilal, for diesel engines purchased between 2013 and 2015. The defendant contends that the suit is barred by limitation and denies any amount being due.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's claims were not substantiated due to lack of adequate evidence.
The plaintiff's claims were not substantiated due to lack of adequate evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Devidas D Pisharady (30 years years)
Eoor South P.O, Eroor, Thripunithura – 682 306
Defendants
Harilal (42 years years)
Puthenpura, Thottupalam, Marutha road, Palakkad – 678 007
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought recovery of an amount due from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is dismissed with costs.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Computer extract of Sales invoices submitted before the sale tax department
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to claim the outstanding amount due from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
True copy of the payment made by the defendant
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was intended to show the payments made by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Office copy of the lawyer notice issued to the defendant
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to show the legal notice sent to the defendant regarding the outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Postal receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used as evidence of the dispatch of the legal notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
True copy of the legal notice received by the defendant
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
This document was used by the defendant to show the discrepancy in the amounts claimed.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type:
Oral Evidence
Submitted By:
Oral evidence
Relevance:
Oral depositions were used to support the claims made by both parties.
Reference: