Case Summary
The case involves a petition filed by Devi Nagar-Idakkulam-Karoorkonam Road Vikasana Samithy for accepting documents in a civil suit regarding title, right, and ownership of certain properties. The defendants argued that the plaintiff is not prosecuting the matter and previous petitions regarding the same documents were dismissed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Documents accepted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition to accept the documents, ruling that the previous dismissal of a similar petition does not bar the current one.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition was found to be maintainable and not barred by previous dismissals as the court allowed for future petitions.
The petition was found to be maintainable and not barred by previous dismissals as the court allowed for future petitions.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court has permitted the party or pleader to file the fresh petition for the same relief, if needed.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed. No order as to costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Devi Nagar-Idakkulam-Karoorkonam Road Vikasana Samithy
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shyla Daniel
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mariamma Daniel
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Daniel Zachariah
- Party Age
- 75
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajesh Kumar.O.S @ Unni
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
12 documents submitted for acceptance
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Deepak.J.M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Dhanya.U.D
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Vishnu Hari.R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.David Varghese Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Premjith.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Suja.G.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Sarga.G.Sajayan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.Jayachnadran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.D.Arun
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Abhijith.D
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petition for accepting the 12 documents was allowed.
Evidence:
Hence I am of the view that this petition filed by the pleader for the party is very well maintainable and not barred by the principle of Estoppel or res judicata and the petition is liable to be allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Document
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court allowed the petition for accepting 12 documents necessary for substantiating the contentions raised by the plaintiff in O.S.409/2014.
Reference:
null
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2014