Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.128/2025

Case between Devakumar.V et al vs Ashokan et al regarding injunction

Court
Court of Additional Munsiff-III
Judge
Smt. Salini.B
Order Date
2025-01-24
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves petitioners Devakumar.V and Ajith.A.S seeking an interim injunction against defendants Ashokan, Preetha, and Rajesh.R. The petitioners aim to prevent the defendants from obstructing the use of a property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad-interim injunction preventing the defendants from making alterations to a property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction preventing the defendants from making alterations to a property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner has made out a prima facie case and delay in granting the injunction would defeat the purpose.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner/plaintiff has made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/defendants from reducing the width of petition B schedule property or obstructing its vehicular access or from altering its nature or from committing any waste in it until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Devakumar.V
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ajith.A.S
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ashokan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Preetha
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajesh. R
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Aneesh. K.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
An ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/defendants from reducing the width of petition B schedule property or obstructing its vehicular access or from altering its nature or from committing any waste in it until further orders.
Evidence:
the petitioner/plaintiff has made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction. Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/defendants from reducing the width of petition B schedule property or obstructing its vehicular access or from altering its nature or from committing any waste in it until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Devakumar.V et al vs Ashokan et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Devakumar.V et al vs Ashokan et al regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won