Case Summary
The plaintiffs, led by Devaki, sought legal redress against the defendants, including Pankajakshan. The court found the plaintiffs absent without representation on prior dates and dismissed the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiffs' continuous absence and lack of representation during hearings.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs failed to show up for the hearings and did not provide any representation.
The plaintiffs failed to show up for the hearings and did not provide any representation.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs failed to show up for the hearings and did not provide any representation.
The plaintiffs failed to show up for the hearings and did not provide any representation.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff is continuously absent on previous postings and no representation is made even after issuance of notice.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit stands dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Devaki
- Party Age
- 85
- Relation
- W/o Bhaskaran
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sudhakumari
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- D/o Devaki
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Suneeshkumari
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- D/o Devaki
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Suresh kumar
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o Bhaskaran
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- D. Asha Devi
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- D/o Devaki
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pankajakshan
- Party Age
- 85
- Relation
- S/o Pachan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sumathi
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- D/o Pachan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajendran @ Rajan
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o Pankajakshan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sadarkutty @ Unni
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o Panjakashan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Athira
- Party Age
- 27
- Relation
- D/o Vinodini
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M.Prabhakaran Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Arul kumar.R.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Krishnajith.R.G
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Smitha Biju Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Thirumala K. Biju kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit stands dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation after notice.
Evidence:
Hence I find no reason to proceed with Suit. Suit stands dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Devaki et al vs Pankajakshan et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Devaki et al vs Pankajakshan et al regarding dismissal of suit