Case Summary
The petitioner, Ibrahim, and the respondent, Devadasan Pillai, were involved in a case concerning the furnishing of security for an attachment. The court found that sufficient security was provided by the defendant, leading to the lifting of the attachment.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition and raised the attachment as sufficient security was furnished by the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
On verification, it is seen that, as per the order in I.A.No.2/2024, the direction was to furnish security from `.2,00,000/- and the plaint claim also is `. 2,00,000/-. Defendant had furnished fixed deposit for `. 2,00,000/- noting lien as security.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition stands allowed and attachment is hereby raised.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Devadasan Pillai
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ibrahim
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Biju K. George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anju O.H.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Mathew P. Paul
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ciju I.S.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petition to lift the attachment was allowed since the defendant provided sufficient security.
Evidence:
Hence petition stands allowed and attachment is hereby raised.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Devadasan Pillai vs Ibrahim regarding security for attachment.
Case Code Year
Case between Devadasan Pillai vs Ibrahim regarding security for attachment.