Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 370/2024

Case between Denny Paul et al vs David et al regarding a settlement

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-10-01
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Denny Paul and Bindu P. Poulose are the plaintiffs in this case against David and others. The matter was settled and the suit was not pressed, leading to its dismissal.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit is dismissed as not pressed based on the statement of the plaintiff's counsel that the matter is settled.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The suit is dismissed as not pressed based on the statement of the plaintiff's counsel that the matter is settled.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Denny Paul
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bindu. P. Poulose
Party Age
36
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
David
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Valsa David
Party Age
61
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Renju David
Party Age
38
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.P. Jacob
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anu V. Kuttan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Soumya C.D.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Johans Jacob P.K.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A.V. James
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is not pressed as the matter is settled.
Evidence:
Counsel for the plaintiff submits matter is settled and hence the suit is not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Denny Paul et al vs David et al regarding a settlement
Case Code Year
Case between Denny Paul et al vs David et al regarding a settlement

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding partnership deed
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding partnership deed
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won