Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 85/2023

Case between Den O Reji vs Babu Mullackal @ Mathayikkutty et al regarding suit rejection

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-10-10
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Den O Reji is the plaintiff in this case, while Babu Mullackal @ Mathayikkutty and Gracy Babu are the defendants. The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and non-payment of balance court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and non-payment of court fees.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and non-payment of court fees.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence and failure to pay the required court fees led to the rejection of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence and failure to pay the required court fees led to the rejection of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff's absence and failure to pay the required court fees led to the rejection of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit rejected. (Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 10th day of October, 2024).

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Den O Reji
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Babu Mullackal @ Mathayikkutty
Party Age
74
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Gracy Babu
Party Age
61
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Melitus Maria Stanly
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Indu E. G
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jobin Paul
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kannan T. R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sunitha Devi M. S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit rejected due to absence of plaintiff and non-payment of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Balance Court Fee not paid. Suit rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Den O Reji vs Babu Mullackal @ Mathayikkutty et al regarding suit rejection
Case Code Year
Case between Den O Reji vs Babu Mullackal @ Mathayikkutty et al regarding suit rejection

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won