RC(OP).No. 25/2025

Case between Deepak. N et al vs Shari. S regarding rent control petition.

Court

COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER, KOLLAM

Judge

Smt. Ragi.S.

Order Date

2025-11-20

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves petitioners Deepak. N and Shobhana against respondent Shari. S regarding a rent control petition. The petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the petitioners.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Rent Control Petition

Final Judgment

The petition was dismissed due to the absence of the petitioners and failure to cure the defect.

Key Reasoning:
The petitioners failed to appear in court, leading to the dismissal of the petition.

Why Defendant Won:
The petitioners failed to appear in court, leading to the dismissal of the petition.

Supporting Evidence

Petitioner absent and no representation. Defect not cured till date.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence petition is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Deepak. N
Party Age: 47
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Shobhana
Party Age: 69
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Shari. S
Party Age: 38
Relation: D/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Mundakkal R. Santhosh Kumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Shanu Nelson
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Anandha Lekshmy V.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Vinu Karunakaran
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Petition is dismissed for default.

Evidence: