Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 137/2015

Case between Deepak Krishnan et al vs Nileesh Coutinho et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-08-16
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiffs Deepak Krishnan, Prasanna Gopalakrishnan, and Pinnacle Innovative Technologies Pvt. Ltd against defendants Nileesh Coutinho and Embee Software (P) Ltd. The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of both parties and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found both parties absent and dismissed the case due to non-prosecution.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found both parties absent and dismissed the case due to non-prosecution.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned.

Judgment Evidence:

As both parties are absent and without representation when the case was called in roll call and there after, suit dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Deepak Krishnan
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o. Late M. Gopalakrishnan
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Prasanna Gopalakrishnan
Party Age
67
Relation
W/o. Late M. Gopalakrishnan
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pinnacle Innovative Technologies Pvt. Ltd
Relation
Rep. by its Director Deepak Krishnan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nileesh Coutinho
Party Age
45
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Embee Software (P) Ltd
Relation
Rep by its General Manager Nileesh Coutinho
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Praveen K Joy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of both parties.
Evidence:
As both parties are absent and without representation when the case was called in roll call and there after, suit dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Deepak Krishnan et al vs Nileesh Coutinho et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Deepak Krishnan et al vs Nileesh Coutinho et al regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won