Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1200/2024

Case between Davis V D vs Johnson K J @ Johny regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-11-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Davis V D, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Johnson K J @ Johny, who has been threatening him regarding an investment issue. The plaintiff claims he is not liable to repay the defendant's investment and seeks to protect his possession of the property.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit, concluding that he failed to prove his case against the defendant. The defendant, being exparte, did not present any evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit, concluding that he failed to prove his case against the defendant. The defendant, being exparte, did not present any evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not provide sufficient evidence to support his claims.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not provide sufficient evidence to support his claims.
Supporting Evidence
I am not satisfied that plaintiff has established his case. Though plaintiff contend that defendant threatened him, no evidence is adduced to support the claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is dismissed. Since defendant is exparte, no costs is ordered.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Davis V D
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Johnson K J @ Johny
Party Age
52
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M M Alikunju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from entering the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
I am not satisfied that plaintiff has established his case.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Threats and attempts to trespass
Case Code
Case between Davis V D vs Johnson K J @ Johny regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Davis V D vs Johnson K J @ Johny regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won