Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1200/2024

Case between Davis V D vs Johnson K J @ Johny regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-11-27
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Davis V D, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Johnson K J @ Johny, who has been threatening him regarding an investment issue. The plaintiff claims he is not liable to repay the defendant's investment and seeks to protect his possession of the property.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit, concluding that he failed to prove his case against the defendant. The defendant, being exparte, did not present any evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not provide sufficient evidence to support his claims.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is dismissed. Since defendant is exparte, no costs is ordered.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Davis V D (58 years) Souparnika, Near Mary Matha School, Vazhakala Village, Vazakala P O, Pin - 682 021, Kanayannoor Taluk

Defendants

Johnson K J @ Johny (52 years) Kaithavalappil House, Fort Vypin, Azheekal P O, Ernakulam District

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from entering the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
I am not satisfied that plaintiff has established his case.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases