Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 90/2022

Case between dARC I FITNESS et al vs Dhaneesh K.R regarding settlement agreement

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-11-19
Duration
approximately-2 years 11 months 0 days
Case Closed
Tue, 11/19/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, dARC I FITNESS, represented by its founder Vishnu S. Nair, filed a suit against the defendant Dhaneesh K.R. The case involved a settlement reached through mediation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the mediation report and decreed the suit in terms of the mediation agreement. The court ordered a refund of court fees to the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund court fee, if any, to the plaintiff.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the mediation report and decreed the suit in terms of the mediation agreement. The court ordered a refund of court fees to the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The mediation report was found lawful and the parties entered into it voluntarily.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The mediation report was found lawful and the parties entered into it voluntarily.
Supporting Evidence
Perused the terms in mediation report and found it lawful and that the parties entered into the same voluntarily.

Judgment Evidence:

Thus the suit is decreed in terms of mediation report.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
dARC I FITNESS
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vishnu S. Nair
Party Age
29
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dhaneesh K.R
Party Age
27
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Mediation report.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Santhosh Peter Mamalyil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.N. Anoop
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sandeep Sudhakaran M.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sunil Nair Palakkat
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.N. Abhilash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ahammed Shaheer M.A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mohammed Ajesh P.B.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rithik S. Anand
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in terms of mediation report.
Evidence:
Thus the suit is decreed in terms of mediation report.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between dARC I FITNESS et al vs Dhaneesh K.R regarding settlement agreement
Case Code Year
Case between dARC I FITNESS et al vs Dhaneesh K.R regarding settlement agreement

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 12/01/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 11/19/2024 - 12:00
From
Fri, 11/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 11/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won