Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1010/2023

Case between Daneesh Kumar vs The Branch Manager, TATA Motors Finance Solutions Pvt Ltd. et al regarding dismissal for default.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-12-21
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Daneesh Kumar filed a suit against TATA Motors Finance Solutions Pvt Ltd. and its Branch Manager. The court ordered the suit to be dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and defendants.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff was absent and not represented. The defendants were also not present.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff was absent and not represented. The defendants were also not present.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, not represented. Defendant not represented.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Daneesh Kumar
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Branch Manager, TATA Motors Finance Solutions Pvt Ltd.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
TATA Motors Finance Solutions Pvt Ltd.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.Shanavas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R.K.Prashanth
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jijo Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.Fazil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Saju Thaliath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jayasree Manoj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Prabitha C.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jithin Paul Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Fadil Fazil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aswathy Jayachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default
Evidence:
Hence, Suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Daneesh Kumar vs The Branch Manager, TATA Motors Finance Solutions Pvt Ltd. et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Daneesh Kumar vs The Branch Manager, TATA Motors Finance Solutions Pvt Ltd. et al regarding dismissal for default.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won