Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 41/2021

Case between Dadha Pharma Distributors Private Limited vs Mr. Meenapallil Lakshmanan Arunya regarding realization of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-03-01
Duration
approximately-4 years 6 months
Case Closed
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Dadha Pharma Distributors Private Limited supplied medicines to Mr. Meenapallil Lakshmanan Arunya on credit. The defendant failed to make the required payments, leading the plaintiff to seek legal recovery.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff the outstanding amount along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.1,06,300/- with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff the outstanding amount along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The oral testimony and documents provided by the plaintiff established their claim without any contradiction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The oral testimony and documents provided by the plaintiff established their claim without any contradiction.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts A1 to A10, established the case as pleaded by the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows. Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.1,06,300/- (Rupees one lakh six thousand three hundred only) from the defendant and from his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dadha Pharma Distributors Private Limited
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Meenapallil Lakshmanan Arunya
Plaintiffs Documents
Invoice No. 298, Invoice No. 768, Invoice No. 604, Invoice No. 319, Invoice No. 047, Invoice No. 264, Invoice No. 818, Invoice No. 602, Invoice No. 604, Statement of account of the defendant.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jacob Chacko
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sajith Naduvilaveettil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Linu G. Nath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
E.D. George
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.1,06,300/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows. Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.1,06,300/- (Rupees one lakh six thousand three hundred only) from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum on Rs.1,06,300/- from the date of suit till date decree.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum for Rs.1,06,300/- (Rupees one lakh six thousand three hundred only) from the date of suit till date decree from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum on Rs.1,06,300/- from date of decree till date of realization.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.1,06,300/- (Rupees one lakh six thousand three hundred only) from date of decree till date of realization from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendant and from his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Invoice issued to the defendants by the plaintiff for the transaction.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Invoice issued to the defendants by the plaintiff for the transaction.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Invoice issued to the defendants by the plaintiff for the transaction.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Invoice issued to the defendants by the plaintiff for the transaction.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Invoice issued to the defendants by the plaintiff for the transaction.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Invoice issued to the defendants by the plaintiff for the transaction.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Invoice issued to the defendants by the plaintiff for the transaction.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Invoice issued to the defendants by the plaintiff for the transaction.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Invoice issued to the defendants by the plaintiff for the transaction.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement of account maintained by the plaintiff that shows the amount owed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A10

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Dadha Pharma Distributors Private Limited vs Mr. Meenapallil Lakshmanan Arunya regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Dadha Pharma Distributors Private Limited vs Mr. Meenapallil Lakshmanan Arunya regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Thoppil Fincorp et al vs Navas A.A et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Nikhil.N. Asher vs Plymart et al regarding suit for realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Space International Air Travels (P) Ltd. vs Tapovan Impex Private Limited regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Ambatt Electricals regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Kureekode Agencies regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won