Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 156/2024

Case between C.V. Sudheer vs Sree Narayana Dharmodharana Sangam regarding dismissal of suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-04-05
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves plaintiffs C.V. Sudheer, Sreekumar Thattarath, and A.R. Santhosh against the Sree Narayana Dharmodharana Sangam and its officials. The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiffs were not present or ready for evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiffs were not present or ready for evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiffs were not present or ready for evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Defendant was present, and the plaintiff's absence led to dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
Defendant was present, and the plaintiff's absence led to dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence in listed case.

Judgment Evidence:

Both represented. Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence in listed case. Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
C.V. Sudheer
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sreekumar Thattarath. B
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
A.R. Santhosh
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sree Narayana Dharmodharana Sangam
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T. P. Raveendran
Relation
President
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M.N. Shanmughan
Relation
Vice-President
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.S Jain
Relation
Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V. B. Shaji
Relation
Joint Secretary
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R. Krishna Raj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
E.S Soni
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Balasubramaniam R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
N. Satheesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arya M.A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anju Dileep
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence in listed case.
Evidence:
Both represented. Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence in listed case. Dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between C.V. Sudheer vs Sree Narayana Dharmodharana Sangam regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between C.V. Sudheer vs Sree Narayana Dharmodharana Sangam regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won