Case Summary
The complainant is absent for more than 10 hearings, which has adversely affected the prosecution of the case. As a result, the complaint is dismissed and the accused is acquitted.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The case is dismissed due to the complaint being continuously absent.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant's continuous absence led to the dismissal of the complaint.
The complainant's continuous absence led to the dismissal of the complaint.
Why Defendant Won:
The complainant's continuous absence led to the dismissal of the complaint.
The complainant's continuous absence led to the dismissal of the complaint.
Supporting Evidence
The prosecution of the case is adversely effected due to the absence of complainant.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, complaint is dismissed U/s 256 Crpc and accused is acquitted.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Complainant
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Accused
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Complaint is dismissed U/s 256 Crpc and accused is acquitted.
Evidence:
Hence, complaint is dismissed U/s 256 Crpc and accused is acquitted.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Complainant vs Accused regarding prosecution of the case
Case Code Year
Case between Complainant vs Accused regarding prosecution of the case